Ras Al Khaimah Port, Phase IA, II, IA-Extension & Cantilever
Wall, United Arab Emirates
Project Description
These projects have covered a timeline of 4 years ranging from 2005 to the end of 2008. All
projects were carried out with the same contractor Athena SA.

Figure 1 Project Artists Initial Outlook
The Ras Al Khaimah Port development is located in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE. An existing port is
to be extended by reclaiming land behind a permanent sheet pile wall. The design proposed is a
main sheet pile wall tied to an anchoring wall of smaller sheet piles.
ESC proposed to use ESC cold formed fabricated sheet piles for the Main Wall and the Anchor
Wall. All parameters were supplied by the client in terms of required capacity.
ESC covered the following scope:
- Sheet pile requirements and Specification
- Corrosion design
- Calculation of sheet pile modulus
- Connection detail of sheet pile and tieback system
Designs undertaken in all of these projects were in conformance with the relevant British
Standards.

Figure 2 Initial platform works begins on site
Structural Requirements (Example for Phase IA)
The specifications for the Main Wall and the Anchor Wall are given in Table 1.
| WALL TYPE |
PILE
LENGTH
(m) |
MAX. DESIGN
BENDING
MOMENT
(kNm/m) |
DESIGN LIFE |
| Main Wall |
16.5 |
616.0 |
30 yrs |
| Anchor Wall |
3.0 |
N/A |
30 yrs |
Table 1: Sheet Pile Requirements
Supplied piles by ESC are given in Table 2.
| WALL TYPE |
PILE TYPE |
DESIGN STRESS
(N/mm2) |
MAX. SECTION
MODULUS
(cm3/m) |
| Main Wall |
ESC46A (6059) |
355 |
4040 |
| Anchor Wall |
ESC18A |
275 |
1800 |
The sheet pile proposed for the Main Wall was a custom designed pile specifically suited to this
project. The sheet pile was built in a modular style which allows the thickness of the plate to be
varied to accommodate different stress levels and corrosion zones.
Table 3 shows the section modulus and moment capacity of each segment of the ESC46A (6059)
sheet pile prior to corrosion loss.
SHEET PILE DATA TABLE
Uncorroded Parameters |
Pile Segment |
Length |
Thickness |
Section Modulus |
Steel Grade |
| T1 |
T2 |
| |
(m) |
(mm) |
(mm) |
(cm3/m) |
|
A B C |
4.5 6.0 6.0 |
16.0 15.0 9.0 |
10.0 9.0 9.0 |
4040.0 3660.0 2500.0 |
S355JOC S355JOC S355JOC |
Table 3: Segment Properties Prior to Corrosion Loss
The ESC18A sheet pile is a standard ESC product.
Full calculations of the derivation of section modulus for the ESC46A (6059) custom pile, and the
ESC18A standard pile were supplied to the Client and their Engineers. All calculations were
performed in accordance with the guidelines set out in BS 5950 Part 5.
Steel piles were manufactured and delivered in accordance with the requirements stated in the BS
EN 10249 Parts 1 and 2. Steel specifications follow those stated in BS EN 10025:1993.
All piles contained welded elements. The welding procedure was designed and approved by
accredited certification bodies (Lloyds) to ensure complete strength transfer across the welded
joint.

Figure 3 ESC18B Anchor Wall Piles ready in the factory for shipment
Coating Requirements (Phase IA and others)
The specified coating for the sheet piles was for sand blasting followed by 50μm of primer and
then 400μm of coal tar epoxy paint. The coating was applied to the entire front surface and two
metres of the back surface of the Main Wall piles only.
ESC will be used a product called JotaCoat 550 for all painting works. ESC work closely with the
paint manufacturer Jotun and have developed a painting specification that is designed to suit high
corrosion environments.

Figure 4 Main Wall Sheet Piles at the Port ready to go

Figure 5 Pile Shoes made for the hard driving conditions
Corrosion Design (Phase IA and others)
The specification for the corrosion design is that the sheet pile must have a design moment
capacity of 616 kNm/m after a thirty year period. Coating was not to be considered in this
calculation.
Corrosion rates varied along the length of the pile depending on the corrosion zones. Likewise,
moments along the length of the pile will vary with the maximum required moment occurring
approximately halfway between the anchor point and the dredged level. The objective of the
corrosion design was therefore to ensure that the moment capacity in this zone is at least
616kNm/m after thirty years.
Corrosion rates as stated in BS 6349 Maritime Structures Part 1: Code of practice for general
criteria ( Table 25) have been adopted. The relevant rates have been summarised in Table 4.
| CORROSION DATA |
Pile
Segment |
Corrosion Zone |
Corrosion Rate |
Period |
Total
Loss |
Reduced
Thickness |
| T1 |
T2 |
| |
|
(mm/yr) |
(yrs) |
(mm) |
(mm) |
(mm) |
A B C |
Splash
Immersion
Embedded |
0.15
0.05
0.03 |
30.0
30.0
30.0 |
4.5
1.5
0.9 |
11.5
13.5
8.1 |
5.5 7.5 8.1 |
Table 4: Corrosion Data
The loss of thickness in each segment will affect the section modulus of the pile and hence the
bending moment capacity.

Figure 6 Anchor Wall Sheet Piles installed
These results are summarised in Table 5.
SHEET PILE DATA TABLE
Corroded Parameters |
Pile
Segment |
Length |
Thickness |
Reduced
Modulus |
Design Stress |
Bending Capacity |
| T1 |
T2 |
| |
(m) |
(mm) |
(mm) |
(cm3/m) |
(N/mm2) |
(kNm/m) |
A B C |
4.5 6.0 6.0 |
11.5
13.5
8.1 |
5.5
7.5
8.1 |
2570.0
3090.0
2170.0 |
230
230
230 |
591
711
499 |
Table 5: Segment Properties Post Corrosion Loss
The stress of 230 N/mm2 is adopted from BS449 as the design stress for sheet pile walls using
high tensile steel. It should also be noted that all the calculations made full allowance for panel
buckling considerations in the thin plate sections.

Figure 7 Installation of the H Pile Cantilever Wall Section

Figure 8 Final installation of the Sheet Piles to depth is carried out by the IHC S90 Hydraulic DropHammer
ESC carried out the alternative design calculations on behalf of the Contractor (Athena SA) and
submitted them for approval to the Client (RAK Government) and their Consultant (Gibb Ltd).
All relevant drawings and engineering detailing was provided by ESC for all projects. Once
approval was received the manufacturing was carried out in the ESC factory for delivery to the
site.

Figure 9 Section Drawing for Construction of Phase IA

Figure 10 Excavation underway for the tie rod installation
As always, ESC personnel were on site to assist Athena SA during the beginning of the
installation process. Several recommendations were made regarding piling guides and handling
processes. ESC provided efficient Dawson Lifting Shackles that helped increase the productivity
of the installation, while ensuring maximum safety during the process.

Figure 11 Tie rod installation is underway
Soil Profile
The existing seabed was between approximately -2.0 EL to +1.0 EL in the vicinity of the
proposed wall. Subsequent filling activity has reclaimed the area to approximately +3.0 EL. Fill
material is dense to very dense sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders.
The original seabed is a layer of medium dense to very dense silty sand, overlying a medium
dense to very dense silty gravel layer with sandstone bands up to 8.0m thick.
Below the gravel layer are pockets of medium dense to dense sands, overlying a very dense sand
layer with sandstone bands at approximately -13.0EL.

Figure 12 Finishing touches before the commissioning of the Port

Figure 13 Dredging to depth to allow the vessels to berth and its ready for commercial work
Sheet Pile Components List for ALL Projects
| Item |
Phase IA |
Phase II |
Cantilever Wall |
Phase IAExtension |
| Sheet Piles |
851 tons |
840 tons |
52 tons
(S10) |
671 tons |
Anchor/Deadman
Piles |
91 tons |
115 tons |
|
77 tons |
| Pile Shoes |
|
252 pc’s |
|
199 pc’s |
| H Piles |
|
|
136 tons
(H60/30B-2) |
|
Tie Rods &
Accessories
(Walings &
Mounting
Brackets) |
20 tons |
23 tons |
|
70 tons |
The tie rods for Phase IA-Extension were supplied by Dextra Manufacturing under the guidance
and design of ESC. The rods supplied were M60mm of steel grade 700 in lengths of up to 24.6
metres. Tie rods were wrapped in Denso tape prior to installation.
Installation Details
Installation was done by pitching the sheet piles in a piling frame and driving to refusal with an
ICE 815 vibro hammer. Piles were then driven to the final required level using an IHC S90
hydraulic hammer, together with a pile helmet.

Figure 14 Finished and ready to accept ships

Figure 15 The first ship comes alongside at Phase 1A August 2006 |